Opposition to the Melbourne Grand Prix is a bourgeois plot
to denigrate a Working Class sport. The
emphasis on the overuse of a public park for an event with limited class appeal
appears to support the rights of ordinary people – class unspecified, and also
has an environmental aspect that immediately co-joins this issue with the social
groups and ideas that are called ‘the left’.
It might be argued against this idea by pointing out the
elitist domination of the Grand Prix by ‘big, international money’ and the
exclusive use of some of its facilities by that small group, and then noting
that these people are reviled by opponents of the Grand Prix. The very small, very wealthy, global elite,
the five percent of the population that owns ninety five percent of everything,
a ratio that has remained similar throughout human history since Classical times
and probably before, are the contemporary version of an Aristocricy, while the
Middle Class and Working Class might be approximately be assumed to be forty
percent each with a five percent ‘under class’.
Before the French Revolution there were moves to align the
peasantry with the aristocracy against the middle class who were the leaders of
the revolution. Still today, most of our
Greens, Socialists and so forth on the ‘left’ are the well-educated children of
the old middle class. Working Class
suburbs are always more conservative, for example supporting the Monarchy. Socialist Governments are mostly run by a middle
class sub-class of the highly educated, supposedly on behalf of the Working
Class who are assumed to be unable to govern themselves without being led by
theorists and activists.
After the Russian Revolution’s blatant social failures emerged
after the first world war, the German left agreed to work with the old upper
class for the sake of social stability.
It led to later problems but this is not the place for detailed history
of the different class groupings though history. These two classes share other aspects because
they are the two original classes before the rise of the middle class. They are both ‘earthy’ in the sense of
swearing and carnal relationships compared to the middle class’s puritan
approach to both. They are also both
public compared to the highly prized privacy of the middle class, because the
working class live in crowded, public conditions and the upper class live
overt, public lives as exhibitionists, though now days only in private. It is little wonder that Motor Racing should
appeal to the extremes of the Social Ladder: Gasoline Alley and the many motor
racing princes. While the Working Class are powerless to end the negativity towards their sport, the other end of the social spectrum are probably amused that the trendy, bourgeois activists oppose them and laugh at ignorant denigration.
Instead of opposition, the aim should be to take maximum
advantage of the Grand Prix. For example,
the much derided pit buildings and temporary facilities for the international,
high-paying visitors could be year-round facilities for park users. Indeed, the effort to preserve the park for
public use really only helps a small number of park users, compared to similar
areas in other places, and a further criticism could be that if the park is to
be saved for anything it is to revive ‘Country’.
A further suggestion will be ridiculed by those who now
oppose the Grand Prix, and that is to make it the Royal Melbourne Grand
Prix. There is a valid criticism that
internationally few people know it is the Melbourne Grand Prix and not the
Australian Grand Prix, so the City does not earn all the global publicity for
which it pays dearly. Making it the
Royal Melbourne Grand Prix would ensure the name was clear and unambiguous, as
well as unique. The way to make the
event truly Royal would be to start it with a carriage race. After all, motor vehicles derive from the
horse-drawn vehicles.
HRH the Duke of
Edinburgh helped develop carriage racing as a competitive sport and raced
himself until recently. An approach to
be patron of such a new vehicle racing sport in conjunction with motor racing
might appeal to His Royal Highness. How
horses galloping down the circuit would affect the road surface might be a
consideration of the sort that bursts bubbles.
It would be interesting to make this a truly Working Class
festival, unabashedly so. With interests
and advertising that appeal to Working Class people that derive from their own
interests and activities, not alcohol and so forth sold to working class people
by big middle class companies. For
example, the Churches could be sponsors, because there is nothing ‘sinful’
about cars and working on them is good, honest ‘work’. The end of greyhound racing
in NSW is similar, with issues over the well-being of the dogs the excuse to
terminate a largely working class sport.
There is an ironic inconsistency in people who eat meat without thinking
about the conditions of the lives or deaths of their food but stress over the
deaths of dogs, and it is even more inconsistent with a world where millions of
people are suffering more than the dogs, including some in Australia: the dogs
can only be an excuse.
If we are to have the Grand Prix, it should pay for
itself. Being able to include it in our
list of International Sporting Fixtures, to support our claim to be World
Sporting Capital, comes at a great cost.
Melbourne remains a car city; while over eighty percent of private
journeys in London are on Public Transport, it is less than twenty percent in
Melbourne (ref mislaid). We can’t extend
the trams and trains significantly, but we could replace half the cars on the
road with buses. Non-polluting buses
that use fuel cells as in many other countries could be built here to replace
our now defunct car manufacturing industries, but for some reason we spend more
on roads for cars. We sure do love our
cars!
